Attorneys for embattled Missouri Gov. Eric Greitens claimed Thursday that the prosecutor in his felony invasion-of-privacy trial hid proof till after the discharge of a legislative committee report that led to requires the Republican to step down.
In an announcement, Greitens claimed St. Louis Circuit Legal professional Kim Gardner, a Democrat, “hid a video that she knew instantly contradicted allegations within the Home report, and she or he allowed her lead investigator to lie about it, beneath oath.”
The report, launched Wednesday, contained detailed testimony from a lady who claimed the governor slapped, grabbed, shoved and threatened her throughout undesirable sexual encounters in 2015, a 12 months earlier than he was elected.
The lady, recognized solely as “Okay.S.,” informed lawmakers that Greitens took nude photograph of her after tying her to train gear and ripping off garments that he had made her become for what she initially thought can be a “attractive exercise.” The alleged photograph led to Greitens’ February indictment by a St. Louis grand jury. He’s set to go to trial Might 14.
Greitens has claimed that the affair was consensual and has denied taking the photograph the girl described. His attorneys have claimed that the girl’s testimony in a March interview with prosecutors backs up the governor’s story.
The protection group stated prosecutors initially claimed a video of the girl’s interview was misplaced because of a recorder malfunction, however then shared the video Wednesday night time — after the discharge of the Legislature’s report.
“The Home report contained explosive, hurtful allegations of coercion, violence, and assault. They’re false,” Greitens stated in his assertion. “These allegations may be refuted with information. Regardless of the Circuit Legal professional’s makes an attempt to maintain it from the folks of Missouri, we’ve video proof that comprises a few of these information.”
Gardner stated in a court docket submitting later Thursday that she provided the video as soon as her workplace decided it might be accessed. She accused Greitens’ attorneys of utilizing “diversionary techniques” to shift the main focus from his “unlawful and reprehensible conduct.”
The lady’s legal professional, Scott Simpson, declined to touch upon the video, citing a gag order within the felony case.
Republican legislative leaders stated they might begin gathering signatures from colleagues subsequent week to name themselves right into a particular session to think about potential disciplinary motion in opposition to Greitens.
The particular Home investigatory committee is to make a suggestion after the common session ends Might 18 about whether or not Greitens ought to face impeachment proceedings to attempt to oust him. It is also anticipated to launch a second report targeted on potential marketing campaign finance violations involving Greitens’ use of a charity donor record to boost cash for his gubernatorial marketing campaign.
Impeachment proceedings can function independently from a felony trial. The state structure lays out a number of grounds for impeachment, together with “ethical turpitude,” though there’s disagreement on whether or not the offending conduct should happen whereas an individual is in workplace.
The Related Press contributed to this report.