Justice Anu Malhotra stated why could not the chief minister apologise to police officers and settle the matter. His counsel has stated he would search directions from tMr Kejriwal on this, following which the courtroom listed the matter for additional listening to on Might 29.
The courtroom was listening to a plea by Mr Kejriwal looking for quashing of a trial courtroom order summoning him in a legal defamation criticism filed by a constable.
Through the previous few weeks, Mr Kejriwal has tendered apology to Mr Jaitley, Bikram Majithia and others for his feedback towards them.
The courtroom had earlier stayed the trial courtroom order summoning Mr Kejriwal within the defamation criticism filed by Delhi Police constable Anil Kumar Taneja, who had sought dismissal of his petition looking for keep and quashing of the trial courtroom order summoning him.
Opposing the chief minister’s plea, the constable in his reply, filed by advocate L N Rao, had alleged that Mr Kejriwal had “crossed all limits of decency” through the use of the insulting phrase ‘thulla’ for a policemen in an interview to a information channel.
Mr Taneja, who had filed the legal defamation criticism filed on July 23, 2015, had claimed that through the use of the slang, Mr Kejriwal “has deliberately insulted complete Delhi Police power as an entire and brought about pointless provocation to the police personnel in Delhi”.
The excessive courtroom in July final had requested Mr Kejriwal to elucidate the which means of phrase ‘thulla’ he had allegedly used towards the policemen whereas staying the trial courtroom’s order.
The phrase utilized by Mr Kejriwal is a Hindi phrase and the excessive courtroom wished to know its which means because it doesn’t exist within the dictionary.
Earlier, Mr Kejriwal’s counsel had advised the courtroom that the phrase ‘Thulla’ was not used towards all policemen however towards these indulging in unsuitable practices.